U.S. patent number D630,025 [Application Number D/343,877] was granted by the patent office on 2011-01-04 for paper product.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The Procter & Gamble Company. Invention is credited to Elizabeth Jan Mercer, Ward William Ostendorf, Rebecca Howland Spitzer.
United States Patent |
D630,025 |
Spitzer , et al. |
January 4, 2011 |
Paper product
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a paper product, as shown and
described.
Inventors: |
Spitzer; Rebecca Howland
(Burlington, KY), Ostendorf; Ward William (West Chester,
OH), Mercer; Elizabeth Jan (Cincinnati, OH) |
Assignee: |
The Procter & Gamble
Company (Cincinnati, OH)
|
Family
ID: |
41380194 |
Appl.
No.: |
D/343,877 |
Filed: |
September 21, 2009 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
12130137 |
May 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
D5/58 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D21H27/02 20130101;
Y10T428/24446 20150115; Y10T428/24455 20150115; Y10T428/24479
20150115; Y10T428/24612 20150115; D21H27/002 20130101 |
Current International
Class: |
0506 |
Field of
Search: |
;D5/20,25,37,49,52,53,54,56,57,58,60,99
;D6/595,603,608,613,616,617,619,622 ;162/140
;428/35.6,43,44,98,141,154,156,187,195,198,542.6,904.4
;D2/749,883,889,980,984,994 ;D24/124,125 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Spear; Robert M
Assistant Examiner: Lohr; Barbara B
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bullock; Roddy M. Zea; Betty J.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a paper product showing our new
ornamental design it being understood that the broken lines define
a repeat unit of the claimed design, which repeats uniformly
throughout the length and width of the paper product; and,
FIG. 2 is a top plan view of a paper product showing our new
ornamental design it being understood that the broken lines
indicate that the pattern repeats throughout the surface of the
paper product and that a specific length and with of the paper
product forms no part of the claimed design.
The broken lines in the drawings form no part of the claim.
* * * * *