U.S. patent number D629,082 [Application Number D/363,556] was granted by the patent office on 2010-12-14 for pipe coupling. This patent grant is currently assigned to Victaulic Company. Invention is credited to Douglas R. Dole, Andrzej Domagala.
United States Patent | D629,082 |
Dole , et al. | December 14, 2010 |
Inventors: | Dole; Douglas R. (Whitehouse Station, NJ), Domagala; Andrzej (Nazareth, PA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Victaulic Company (Easton,
PA) |
Appl. No.: | D/363,556 |
Filed: | June 11, 2010 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/262 |
Current International Class: | 2301 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/259-262 ;239/428.5 ;261/DIG.22 ;D8/396 ;285/1,112,179,340,367,373,404,53,915 ;403/291,300 ;411/5,10 ;137/801 |
2278997 | April 1942 | Knight |
4026586 | May 1977 | Kennedy et al. |
4408788 | October 1983 | Beukema |
4522434 | June 1985 | Webb |
4561678 | December 1985 | Kunsman |
4601495 | July 1986 | Webb |
4611839 | September 1986 | Rung et al. |
6533333 | March 2003 | Radzik |
D616532 | May 2010 | Madara et al. |
D616533 | May 2010 | Bowman et al. |
D618312 | June 2010 | Madara et al. |
D618314 | June 2010 | Bowman et al. |
2005/0104369 | May 2005 | Webb et al. |
2007/0296213 | December 2007 | Jones et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.