U.S. patent number D627,220 [Application Number D/353,436] was granted by the patent office on 2010-11-16 for blister pack. This patent grant is currently assigned to Molecular Bioproducts, Inc.. Invention is credited to Jesse B. Cohen, William R. LeMaster.
United States Patent | D627,220 |
LeMaster , et al. | November 16, 2010 |
Inventors: | LeMaster; William R. (San Diego, CA), Cohen; Jesse B. (San Diego, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Molecular Bioproducts, Inc.
(San Diego, CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/353,436 |
Filed: | January 8, 2010 |
Current U.S. Class: | D9/425 |
Current International Class: | 0903 |
Field of Search: | ;D9/424-426,429-432,435,732 ;D7/538,540,542,550.1,565,584,601-603,605,629 ;220/4.23-4.24,23.86,315,367.1,571,600,608,752,780-781,788,791-793,835,839 ;229/105,117.09,117.26,189,406,407,902,905,915.1 ;206/501-509,512 ;426/106 |
3498494 | March 1970 | Voorhees, Jr. |
D276025 | October 1984 | Hexamer |
D283399 | April 1986 | Forbes, Jr. |
D296192 | June 1988 | Ramirez |
D415416 | October 1999 | Anderson et al. |
6202886 | March 2001 | Schneider et al. |
D439839 | April 2001 | Wolf et al. |
D593369 | June 2009 | Green et al. |
7721891 | May 2010 | Dubois |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.