U.S. patent number D624,702 [Application Number D/341,939] was granted by the patent office on 2010-09-28 for hair trimmer. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Gillette Company. Invention is credited to Bjoern Kling, Kristopher William Schulz, Brian Patrick Watson.
United States Patent | D624,702 |
Schulz , et al. | September 28, 2010 |
Inventors: | Schulz; Kristopher William (Framingham, MA), Watson; Brian Patrick (Albion, RI), Kling; Bjoern (Glashuetten, DE) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Gillette Company (Boston,
MA) |
Appl. No.: | D/341,939 |
Filed: | August 14, 2009 |
Current U.S. Class: | D28/53 |
Current International Class: | 2803 |
Field of Search: | ;30/29.5,30,32,34.05,34.1,34.2,43-43.92,44-45,526-537,196,201,223,233,233.5 ;D28/44,44.1,49-54 |
D432265 | October 2000 | Kling et al. |
D445541 | July 2001 | Wursthorn |
D486267 | February 2004 | Goetschi |
D509026 | August 2005 | Leventhal et al. |
D513343 | December 2005 | Bokelman-Dumas |
D539478 | March 2007 | Leventhal et al. |
D560309 | January 2008 | Garland et al. |
D571954 | June 2008 | Kling et al. |
D577864 | September 2008 | Kitagawa et al. |
D591453 | April 2009 | Micinilio et al. |
2005/0246902 | November 2005 | Poran |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.