Simulated stone siding panel
King August 24, 2
U.S. patent number D622,420 [Application Number D/346,551] was granted by the patent office on 2010-08-24 for simulated stone siding panel. This patent grant is currently assigned to Tapco International Corporation. Invention is credited to Daniel W. King.
| United States Patent | D622,420 |
| King | August 24, 2010 |
Simulated stone siding panel
Claims
CLAIM I claim an ornamental design for a simulated stone siding panel, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | King; Daniel W. (Copley, OH) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Tapco International Corporation
(Wixom, MI) |
| Appl. No.: | D/346,551 |
| Filed: | November 2, 2009 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D25/151 |
| Current International Class: | 2501 |
| Field of Search: | ;D25/138-164,111-118 ;52/275-276,311.1,311.2,314,390,506.05,515,503-505,612 ;156/71,211 ;404/34,42,44 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2006635 | July 1935 | Farr |
| D124014 | December 1940 | Coburn |
| 2245047 | June 1941 | Odell |
| 2246377 | June 1941 | Mattes |
| D133920 | September 1942 | Beeson |
| 2382234 | August 1945 | Koch |
| D153109 | March 1949 | Bordeaux |
| D190779 | June 1961 | Steckl |
| 3593479 | July 1971 | Hinds et al. |
| D239276 | March 1976 | Terwilliger |
| 4275540 | June 1981 | Keller |
| 5363623 | November 1994 | King |
| 5455099 | October 1995 | Banner |
| 5465486 | November 1995 | King |
| 5565056 | October 1996 | Lause et al. |
| 5806185 | September 1998 | King |
| D405200 | February 1999 | Hines |
| D477091 | July 2003 | Manthei |
| 6635218 | October 2003 | King |
| D506839 | June 2005 | King |
| D507666 | July 2005 | King |
| D507837 | July 2005 | King |
| 7008213 | March 2006 | King |
| 7296989 | November 2007 | King |
| 2007/0082180 | April 2007 | King |
| 2007/0144095 | June 2007 | King |
| 2009/0038252 | February 2009 | King |
Other References
|
Nailite Installation Guildelines; www.nailite.com; prior to Aug. 20, 2009. cited by other . BellaStone by Crane, Product Guide; www.ExteriorPortfolio.com/BellaStone; prior to Aug. 20, 2009. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Oliver; Catherine R
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a simulated stone siding panel. The simulated stone siding panel has a front face with decorative blocks having contours simulating natural stone. Three of the blocks are being shown with solid lines. Adjacent blocks, shown in phantom, illustrate an environment for the three blocks of the simulated stone siding panel and form no part of the claimed invention. These adjacent blocks, if claimed, would include the same stippling as the three claimed blocks in FIG. 1. An upper interlock and nail hem is also shown in solid lines.
FIG. 2 is a front view of the simulated stone siding panel of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a right side view of the simulated stone siding panel of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a left side view of the simulated stone siding panel of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is a top view of the simulated stone siding panel of FIG. 1.
FIG. 6 is a bottom view of the simulated stone siding panel of FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 7 is a rear view of the simulated stone siding panel of FIG. 1.
* * * * *
References
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 