U.S. patent number D620,933 [Application Number D/332,964] was granted by the patent office on 2010-08-03 for butterfly monitor. This patent grant is currently assigned to Vestalife, LLC. Invention is credited to Christopher Glupker, Wayne Ludlum, Ravi Sawhney.
United States Patent | D620,933 |
Ludlum , et al. | August 3, 2010 |
Inventors: | Ludlum; Wayne (Studio City, CA), Glupker; Christopher (Thousand Oaks, CA), Sawhney; Ravi (Thousand Oaks, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Vestalife, LLC (Encino,
CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/332,964 |
Filed: | February 27, 2009 |
Current U.S. Class: | D14/371 |
Current International Class: | 1402 |
Field of Search: | ;D14/371-376,125-129,336,341,132 ;248/917-924,121,278.1 ;341/12 ;345/104,156,173,174,901-905 ;348/180,184,325,739,837 ;361/679.21 ;349/1,2,11,58 |
D356075 | March 1995 | Paloyan et al. |
D453333 | February 2002 | Chen |
D464050 | October 2002 | Mori |
D493787 | August 2004 | Avery |
D496042 | September 2004 | Borsboom |
D502179 | February 2005 | Cha et al. |
D537441 | February 2007 | Bruker |
D538800 | March 2007 | Zhang et al. |
D538801 | March 2007 | Taylor |
D585399 | January 2009 | Hwang |
2005/0048457 | March 2005 | Ferrigno et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.