U.S. patent number D612,303 [Application Number D/326,219] was granted by the patent office on 2010-03-23 for scooter. This patent grant is currently assigned to Pride Mobility Products Corporation. Invention is credited to Robert A. Carlton, Charles J. Martis.
United States Patent | D612,303 |
Carlton , et al. | March 23, 2010 |
Inventors: | Carlton; Robert A. (Ringgold, GA), Martis; Charles J. (Harding, PA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Pride Mobility Products
Corporation (Exeter, PA) |
Appl. No.: | D/326,219 |
Filed: | October 14, 2008 |
Current U.S. Class: | D12/133; D12/128 |
Current International Class: | 1212 |
Field of Search: | ;D12/128-133 ;D21/433 ;D34/12,27,30 ;280/62,647-650,29,200,47.38,250.1,259,642,658 ;296/65.03,65.04 ;297/DIG.4 ;135/65-67,74 |
D275379 | September 1984 | Wenzel |
D396834 | August 1998 | Wu |
D479496 | September 2003 | Tsai et al. |
D489296 | May 2004 | Tsai |
D490029 | May 2004 | Chao |
D490753 | June 2004 | Tsai |
D494512 | August 2004 | Cheng |
D508664 | August 2005 | Armstrong et al. |
D509774 | September 2005 | Chen |
D511720 | November 2005 | Chen |
D517456 | March 2006 | Wu et al. |
D530650 | October 2006 | Azuma et al. |
D536283 | February 2007 | Cartellone et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.