U.S. patent number D610,432 [Application Number D/316,111] was granted by the patent office on 2010-02-23 for combined envelope opener and scissors sharpener. This patent grant is currently assigned to CRI 2000, L.P.. Invention is credited to Lee M. Siegel.
United States Patent | D610,432 |
Siegel | February 23, 2010 |
Inventors: | Siegel; Lee M. (San Diego, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | CRI 2000, L.P. (San Diego,
CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/316,111 |
Filed: | August 25, 2009 |
Current U.S. Class: | D8/104 |
Current International Class: | 0803 |
Field of Search: | ;D8/98,107,102,103,104,48,99,41 ;D19/65 ;30/DIG.3,294 ;254/28 ;7/160 |
D306394 | March 1990 | Koenig |
D329184 | September 1992 | Lage et al. |
D329584 | September 1992 | Shevin et al. |
D329798 | September 1992 | Kramer et al. |
D333773 | March 1993 | Schapiro, Jr. |
5285577 | February 1994 | Carney et al. |
D372184 | July 1996 | Bender, Jr. |
D372655 | August 1996 | Lin |
D379057 | May 1997 | Lin |
D388306 | December 1997 | Vaught |
D421889 | March 2000 | Moore |
D488698 | April 2004 | Moore |
D539318 | March 2007 | Oas |
D543823 | June 2007 | Lee |
D543824 | June 2007 | Lee |
D567056 | April 2008 | Lee |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.