Shoe sole

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a shoe sole according to my new design;

FIG. 2 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a left side view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a right side view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a rear view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view of an alternative embodiment of the shoe sole according to the present invention, the appearance of the shoe sole being identical to the first embodiment except for an indication of surface contrast;

FIG. 8 is a left side view of the alternative embodiment; and,

FIG. 9 is a right side view of the alternative embodiment.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe sole, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Anderson; Jordan (Lancaster, OH)
Assignee:	Rocky Brands, Inc. (Nelsonville, OH)
Appl. No.:	D/335,273
Filed:	April 13, 2009

---

Current U.S. Class:	D2/960; D2/959; D2/957; D2/953; D2/951
Current International Class:	0204
Field of Search:	;D2/947,951,952,953,957,959,960 ;36/3B,22R,24.5,25R,67A,59C,103

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D107977	January 1938	Tousley
D122777	October 1940	Laybolt
D146505	March 1947	Kavenagh
D231717	June 1974	Gottlieb
4160331	July 1979	Bell
D262581	January 1982	Chevallereau
D341023	November 1993	Frederick
D343726	February 1994	Kawasaki
D353257	December 1994	Kayano
D413012	August 1999	Challant
D433790	November 2000	Oliver
D449428	October 2001	McClaskie
D487840	March 2004	Hillyer
D501708	February 2005	Andrews-Kramer
D504205	April 2005	Andrews-Kramer
D547038	July 2007	Nakano
D554840	November 2007	McClaskie
D554841	November 2007	McClaskie
D564192	March 2008	Covatch
D569595	May 2008	Le
2003/0172548	September 2003	Fuerst

Primary Examiner: Murphy; Celia A
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP