Divot tool
Regalado December 15, 2
U.S. patent number D606,149 [Application Number D/326,909] was granted by the patent office on 2009-12-15 for divot tool. This patent grant is currently assigned to Pacific Gold Accessories, Inc.. Invention is credited to Mark A. Regalado.
| United States Patent | D606,149 |
| Regalado | December 15, 2009 |
Divot tool
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a divot tool, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Regalado; Mark A. (Tigard, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Pacific Gold Accessories, Inc.
(Beaverton, OR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/326,909 |
| Filed: | October 27, 2008 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/793 |
| Current International Class: | 2102 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/789,793-794 ;473/286,408,406 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D345776 | April 1994 | Williams |
| D356358 | March 1995 | Woodruff |
| D406297 | March 1999 | Fazekas |
| D442249 | May 2001 | Fazekas |
| D465539 | November 2002 | Tate |
| D496705 | September 2004 | Louttit |
| D504932 | May 2005 | Louttit |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Marger Johson & McCollom, P.C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the divot tool; and,
FIG. 2 is an exploded view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 