Chair back

Pearson , et al. September 29, 2

Patent Grant D600952

U.S. patent number D600,952 [Application Number D/334,249] was granted by the patent office on 2009-09-29 for chair back. This patent grant is currently assigned to Steelcase Inc.. Invention is credited to Nick Carpenter, Tom Lloyd, James Ludwig, Luke Pearson, Bruce Smith.


United States Patent D600,952
Pearson ,   et al. September 29, 2009

Chair back

Claims

CLAIM We claim the ornamental design for a chair back, as shown and described.
Inventors: Pearson; Luke (London, GB), Lloyd; Tom (London, GB), Carpenter; Nick (London, GB), Ludwig; James (Grand Rapids, MI), Smith; Bruce (Grand Rapids, MI)
Assignee: Steelcase Inc. (Grand Rapids, MI)
Appl. No.: D/334,249
Filed: March 23, 2009

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
29318693 May 26, 2008

Current U.S. Class: D6/716.4
Current International Class: 0601
Field of Search: ;D6/334-336,364,365,366,367,368,370,374,376,379,498,500-502 ;297/411.2,411.41,411.44,451.1,452.18,452.21,452.29,452.35,452.37,452.48,452.63

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
538708 May 1895 Smith
2530924 November 1950 Turner
D164204 August 1951 Smith
2798538 July 1957 Dreifke
2843195 July 1958 Barvaeus
2893476 July 1959 Liljengren
D194740 March 1963 Parker
3202734 August 1965 Home
3669499 June 1972 Semplonius et al.
4744603 May 1988 Knoblock
4776633 October 1988 Knoblock et al.
D319354 August 1991 Wolcott
5040847 August 1991 Nguyen
5102196 April 1992 Kaneda et al.
D330292 October 1992 Nguyen
D332530 January 1993 Nguyen
D341265 November 1993 Gehry
D344191 February 1994 Gehry
D345656 April 1994 Theobald
5333934 August 1994 Knoblock
5352022 October 1994 Knoblock
5366273 November 1994 Bresch
D360538 July 1995 Skalka
5487591 January 1996 Knoblock
5577811 November 1996 Ogg
5611598 March 1997 Knoblock
5664835 September 1997 Desanta
5683142 November 1997 Gunderson et al.
5938284 August 1999 Coffield
D413452 September 1999 Rhienen
D420824 February 2000 Lin
6019428 February 2000 Coffield
6027171 February 2000 Partington et al.
6186594 February 2001 Valiquette et al.
D456159 April 2002 Ball et al.
6378942 April 2002 Chu
D456650 May 2002 Ball et al.
D457023 May 2002 Ball et al.
6386638 May 2002 Strauch
D459923 July 2002 Chu
6419318 July 2002 Albright
6523898 February 2003 Ball et al.
6688687 February 2004 Chu
6698833 March 2004 Ball et al.
6712427 March 2004 Bourdkane et al.
6755467 June 2004 Chu
6913315 July 2005 Ball et al.
6969115 November 2005 Bourdkane et al.
6971717 December 2005 Rhodes
7032971 April 2006 Williams
7097247 August 2006 Battey et al.
7128373 October 2006 Kurtycz et al.
7131694 November 2006 Buffa
7216933 May 2007 Schmidt et al.
D553376 October 2007 Nakamura et al.
2005/0093354 May 2005 Ball et al.
2007/0057548 March 2007 Buffa
2007/0057549 March 2007 Ball et al.
Primary Examiner: De; Mimosa
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McDermott Will & Emery LLP

Description



FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a chair back according to the new design; and,

FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view of a chair back shown in FIG. 1.

In the drawings, the broken lines form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed