U.S. patent number D599,476 [Application Number D/327,037] was granted by the patent office on 2009-09-01 for surgical sponge. This patent grant is currently assigned to Ian Levine. Invention is credited to Ian Levine, Craig Rogers.
United States Patent | D599,476 |
Levine , et al. | September 1, 2009 |
Inventors: | Levine; Ian (Cote St. Luc, Quebec, CA), Rogers; Craig (Plymouth, MI) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Levine; Ian (Cote St. Luc,
Quebec, CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/327,037 |
Filed: | October 29, 2008 |
Current U.S. Class: | D24/119 |
Current International Class: | 2402 |
Field of Search: | ;D24/119,133,141,127,124,108 ;606/162,180,4,5 ;D28/7,8 ;604/1,2,19,3,309,73,540 ;132/317 ;600/572 ;401/196 ;D25/113 |
3332429 | July 1967 | Bates |
D300854 | April 1989 | Singletary, Jr. |
D306082 | February 1990 | Kidd |
D323409 | January 1992 | Giese |
D328496 | August 1992 | Quigley et al. |
D350605 | September 1994 | Williams |
D360705 | July 1995 | Martin et al. |
D367137 | February 1996 | Pollak et al. |
D388169 | December 1997 | Harris |
D423715 | April 2000 | Kleeberg |
D448520 | September 2001 | Dickson |
D480819 | October 2003 | Barbier |
D531357 | October 2006 | McEwen |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.