Mosaic pattern
Li August 18, 2
U.S. patent number D598,577 [Application Number D/317,553] was granted by the patent office on 2009-08-18 for mosaic pattern. This patent grant is currently assigned to P&L Marble, Inc.. Invention is credited to Zong Li.
| United States Patent | D598,577 |
| Li | August 18, 2009 |
Mosaic pattern
Claims
CLAIM The new ornamental design of a mosaic pattern, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Li; Zong (East Farmingdale, NY) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | P&L Marble, Inc. (Los
Angeles, CA) |
| Appl. No.: | D/317,553 |
| Filed: | May 1, 2008 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D25/138 |
| Current International Class: | 2501 |
| Field of Search: | ;52/311.2,313,384,390 ;428/33,49,50,51 ;D25/157,158,159,160,138 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 6156402 | December 2000 | Smith |
| D519651 | April 2006 | Simic |
| D528671 | September 2006 | Grafenauer |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Steptoe & Johnson LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view, depicting a mosaic pattern a portion of which includes reflective surfaces;
FIG. 2 is a top view, depicting the mosaic pattern of FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 3 is a side view, depicting the mosaic pattern of FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 