Headlamp
Petzl May 19, 2
U.S. patent number D592,781 [Application Number D/300,425] was granted by the patent office on 2009-05-19 for headlamp. This patent grant is currently assigned to Zedel. Invention is credited to Paul Petzl.
| United States Patent | D592,781 |
| Petzl | May 19, 2009 |
Headlamp
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a headlamp, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Petzl; Paul (Barraux, FR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Zedel (Crolles,
FR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/300,425 |
| Filed: | March 26, 2008 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D26/39 |
| Current International Class: | 2602 |
| Field of Search: | ;D26/37-50 ;362/157,158,171-174,183-208 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D553270 | October 2007 | Xu |
| D566310 | April 2008 | Alessio |
| D568509 | May 2008 | Shiu |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Oliff & Berridge, PLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a headlamp;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right-side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left-side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a rear view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom view thereof.
The broken lines depict environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 