U.S. patent number D592,295 [Application Number D/321,524] was granted by the patent office on 2009-05-12 for honeypot humidifier. This patent grant is currently assigned to Dr. Fresh, Inc.. Invention is credited to Puneet Nanda.
United States Patent | D592,295 |
Nanda | May 12, 2009 |
Inventors: | Nanda; Puneet (Cerritos, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Dr. Fresh, Inc. (Buena Park,
CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/321,524 |
Filed: | July 17, 2008 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/356 |
Current International Class: | 2304 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/356,355,364,359,360,362,352,366,369,332,333,335,336,342,351 ;422/120,122 ;55/356,473,504 ;96/97 ;D14/188,170,172 ;261/DIG.17,DIG.65,DIG.88,DIG.31 |
D252102 | June 1979 | Mandon et al. |
D318912 | August 1991 | von Philipp et al. |
D321476 | November 1991 | Alcover |
D368771 | April 1996 | Patel et al. |
D381561 | July 1997 | Manca |
D392032 | March 1998 | Zaragoza et al. |
D454190 | March 2002 | Trocola |
D475445 | June 2003 | Kumar |
D509890 | September 2005 | Stavale et al. |
D535376 | January 2007 | Michaels et al. |
D544084 | June 2007 | Michaels et al. |
D544593 | June 2007 | Yamamoto |
D547850 | July 2007 | Michaels et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.