U.S. patent number D587,573 [Application Number D/286,020] was granted by the patent office on 2009-03-03 for sprayer shroud. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Procter & Gamble Company. Invention is credited to Mina Sato.
United States Patent | D587,573 |
Sato | March 3, 2009 |
Inventors: | Sato; Mina (Kobe, JP) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Procter & Gamble
Company (Cincinnati, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/286,020 |
Filed: | April 19, 2007 |
Current U.S. Class: | D9/448 |
Current International Class: | 0907 |
Field of Search: | ;D9/686,685,682,448 ;D8/51 ;D23/226,213 ;417/411 ;401/190 ;239/337,120 ;222/402.11,383.3,383.1,323,179.5,109,1 |
D358198 | May 1995 | Wadsworth |
D366692 | January 1996 | Wadsworth |
D377602 | January 1997 | Wadsworth |
D381581 | July 1997 | Wadsworth |
D409915 | May 1999 | Durliat et al. |
D409917 | May 1999 | Wadsworth et al. |
D423934 | May 2000 | Brozell |
D442088 | May 2001 | Trepina et al. |
D520872 | May 2006 | Paas et al. |
D569248 | May 2008 | Seum et al. |
D569725 | May 2008 | Adamson et al. |
D570215 | June 2008 | Arminak |
D579329 | October 2008 | Sweeton et al. |
D579330 | October 2008 | Sweeton et al. |
2005/0082311 | April 2005 | Good et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.