U.S. patent number D583,457 [Application Number D/317,072] was granted by the patent office on 2008-12-23 for air freshener device. This patent grant is currently assigned to Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited. Invention is credited to Peter Kay, Miles Rudling, Dai Sanders, Dan Tyce.
United States Patent | D583,457 |
Kay , et al. | December 23, 2008 |
Inventors: | Kay; Peter (Warwick, GB), Rudling; Miles (Warwick, GB), Sanders; Dai (Warwick, GB), Tyce; Dan (Warwick, GB) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited
(Slough, Berkshire, GB) |
Appl. No.: | D/317,072 |
Filed: | April 22, 2008 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/366 |
Current International Class: | 2899 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/355-396 ;261/DIG.17,DIG.43,DIG.65,DIG.88,DIG.89 ;239/34,35,53,56,57,60,136,326 ;392/386,394,395 ;D28/5,6 |
D535004 | January 2007 | Furner et al. |
D538915 | March 2007 | Anderson et al. |
D546434 | July 2007 | Barraclough |
D548317 | August 2007 | Newton et al. |
D561884 | February 2008 | Furner et al. |
D561885 | February 2008 | Furner et al. |
D561886 | February 2008 | Furner et al. |
D567920 | April 2008 | Cantoni et al. |
7357561 | April 2008 | Hidalgo et al. |
D568978 | May 2008 | Kennedy et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.