U.S. patent number D583,180 [Application Number D/292,141] was granted by the patent office on 2008-12-23 for circle nesting pillow. Invention is credited to Mariam-Sena Haile.
United States Patent | D583,180 |
Haile | December 23, 2008 |
Inventors: | Haile; Mariam-Sena (Brooklyn, NY) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/292,141 |
Filed: | September 28, 2007 |
Current U.S. Class: | D6/601 |
Current International Class: | 0609 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/595,596,601,604-606 ;5/630-632,636,645,652-655,652.1,655.3-655.5,722,930 ;D19/62,64 ;D21/470,478,479,484,488,491,500 ;D24/183 ;116/63P ;441/127,129 |
1742186 | January 1930 | Claus |
2805428 | September 1957 | Buchman |
3118152 | January 1964 | Talley, Jr. |
3848281 | November 1974 | Mathews |
3987507 | October 1976 | Hall |
D270800 | October 1983 | Fuller |
D278779 | May 1985 | Sink |
4866800 | September 1989 | Bedford |
D349145 | July 1994 | Haughey |
6581229 | June 2003 | Bernstein |
D482080 | November 2003 | Godin |
6760935 | July 2004 | Burton et al. |
6761604 | July 2004 | Hronek |
D546106 | July 2007 | Haile |
2002/0096102 | July 2002 | Sloot |
2002/0108179 | August 2002 | Kiser |
2004/0172762 | September 2004 | Lenyo |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.