U.S. patent number D582,532 [Application Number D/289,427] was granted by the patent office on 2008-12-09 for air purifier. Invention is credited to Greg Gonzalez, Thomas Murdoch.
United States Patent | D582,532 |
Murdoch , et al. | December 9, 2008 |
Inventors: | Murdoch; Thomas (Wimbledon, London, SW19 7PA, GB), Gonzalez; Greg (Wimbledon, London, SW19 7PA, GB) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/289,427 |
Filed: | July 18, 2007 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/364 |
Current International Class: | 2304 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/364,355,356,359,360,362,352,366,369,332,333,335,336,342,351 ;422/120,122 ;55/356,473,504 ;96/63 ;D14/188,170,172 ;261/DIG.17,DIG.65,DIG.88,DIG.31 |
D365629 | December 1995 | Wallwork et al. |
D370704 | June 1996 | Oberhoff |
D415267 | October 1999 | Kauzlarich et al. |
D460545 | July 2002 | Hautmann et al. |
D479592 | September 2003 | Lammel et al. |
D491255 | June 2004 | Glucksman et al. |
D509890 | September 2005 | Stavale et al. |
D509894 | September 2005 | Hoyt et al. |
D510135 | September 2005 | Mariotti |
D519623 | April 2006 | Wu |
D541923 | May 2007 | Castillo Higareda |
D544085 | June 2007 | Schriner et al. |
D561886 | February 2008 | Furner et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.