U.S. patent number D580,040 [Application Number D/306,661] was granted by the patent office on 2008-11-04 for air freshener. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Procter & Gamble Company. Invention is credited to Brian Patrick Bjelovuk, Finnegan O'Jennings McKenty, Michael Thomas Roller, Keara Elyse Schwartz.
United States Patent | D580,040 |
Schwartz , et al. | November 4, 2008 |
Inventors: | Schwartz; Keara Elyse (Cincinnati, OH), Bjelovuk; Brian Patrick (Westerville, OH), McKenty; Finnegan O'Jennings (Cincinnati, OH), Roller; Michael Thomas (Covington, KY) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Procter & Gamble
Company (Cincinnati, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/306,661 |
Filed: | April 14, 2008 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/366 |
Current International Class: | 2899 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/355-396 ;261/DIG.17,DIG.43,DIG.65,DIG.88,DIG.89 ;239/34,35,53,56,57,60,136,326 ;392/386,394,395 ;D28/5,6 |
D253489 | November 1979 | Hoyt |
4526592 | July 1985 | Armbruster |
D282484 | February 1986 | Armbruster |
D366108 | January 1996 | Traylor et al. |
D427301 | June 2000 | Sato et al. |
D456888 | May 2002 | Buthier |
D485607 | January 2004 | Wu |
D517673 | March 2006 | Yamamoto et al. |
7188780 | March 2007 | Martens, III |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.