Sanitaryware
Schmidt October 28, 2
U.S. patent number D579,532 [Application Number D/281,347] was granted by the patent office on 2008-10-28 for sanitaryware. Invention is credited to Fritz Carel Schmidt.
| United States Patent | D579,532 |
| Schmidt | October 28, 2008 |
Sanitaryware
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for sanitaryware, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Schmidt; Fritz Carel (Lansdowne 7760, ZA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/281,347 |
| Filed: | June 21, 2007 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D23/295 |
| Current International Class: | 2302 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/295,301,303,309,299 ;4/664,300,420,DIG.15 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D484223 | December 2003 | Tani et al. |
| D509575 | September 2005 | Kergoet |
| D559961 | January 2008 | Maruhashi |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Stites & Harbison PLLC Jackson; Douglas E.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevation of sanitaryware of my new design;
FIG. 2 is a pictorial view of the sanitaryware of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a side elevation of the sanitaryware of FIG. 1, the other side corresponding; and,
FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the sanitaryware of FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 