Computing device
Andre , et al. August 5, 2
U.S. patent number D574,378 [Application Number D/296,887] was granted by the patent office on 2008-08-05 for computing device. This patent grant is currently assigned to Apple Inc.. Invention is credited to Bartley K. Andre, Daniel J. Coster, Richard P. Howarth, Daniele De Iuliis, Jonathan P. Ive, Steve Jobs, Duncan Robert Kerr, Shin Nishibori, Matthew Dean Rohrbach, Douglas B. Satzger, Calvin Q. Seid, Christopher J. Stringer, Eugene Antony Whang, Rico Zorkendorfer.
| United States Patent | D574,378 |
| Andre , et al. | August 5, 2008 |
Computing device
Claims
CLAIM We claim the ornamental design for a computing device, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Andre; Bartley K. (Menlo Park, CA), Coster; Daniel J. (San Francisco, CA), Iuliis; Daniele De (San Francisco, CA), Howarth; Richard P. (San Francisco, CA), Ive; Jonathan P. (San Francisco, CA), Jobs; Steve (Palo Alto, CA), Kerr; Duncan Robert (San Francisco, CA), Nishibori; Shin (San Francisco, CA), Rohrbach; Matthew Dean (San Francisco, CA), Satzger; Douglas B. (Menlo Park, CA), Seid; Calvin Q. (Palo Alto, CA), Stringer; Christopher J. (Portola Valley, CA), Whang; Eugene Antony (San Francisco, CA), Zorkendorfer; Rico (San Francisco, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Apple Inc. (Cupertino,
CA) |
| Family ID: | 38870935 |
| Appl. No.: | D/296,887 |
| Filed: | October 30, 2007 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29259461 | May 8, 2006 | D558753 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D14/315 |
| Current CPC Class: | G06F1/1679 20130101; G06F1/1616 20130101 |
| Current International Class: | 1402 |
| Field of Search: | ;D14/315-327 ;D18/1,2,7,11 ;235/145A,145R ;341/22,23 ;345/156,157,168,169,173 ;361/680-686 ;348/373 ;715/783 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D391927 | March 1998 | Faranda et al. |
| 5793355 | August 1998 | Youens |
| 6067224 | May 2000 | Nobuchi |
| D431821 | October 2000 | Mizuno |
| 6876546 | April 2005 | Tsao |
| D512997 | December 2005 | Lee et al. |
| 2005/0018396 | January 2005 | Nakajima et al. |
| 2005/0041378 | February 2005 | Hamada et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: SAIDMAN DesignLaw Group
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a computing device while in an open position in accordance with the present design. The computing device may for example correspond to a portable or laptop computer.
FIG. 2 is a top view computing device while in a closed position.
FIG. 3 is a bottom view computing device while in a closed position.
FIG. 4 is a front view computing device while in a closed position.
FIG. 5 is a rear view computing device while in a closed position.
FIG. 6 is a left view of the computing device while in a closed position.
FIG. 7 is a right side view computing device while in a closed position.
FIG. 8 is a front view of the computing device while in an open position.
FIG. 9 is a top view computing device while in an open position; and,
FIG. 10 is a right side view of the computing device while in an open position.
The features shown in broken lines in the various Figures are for illustrating environmental structure and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 