Modular study furniture
Newhouse April 8, 2
U.S. patent number D565,850 [Application Number D/284,621] was granted by the patent office on 2008-04-08 for modular study furniture. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Worden Company. Invention is credited to Thomas J. Newhouse.
| United States Patent | D565,850 |
| Newhouse | April 8, 2008 |
Modular study furniture
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for modular study furniture, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Newhouse; Thomas J. (Grand Rapids, MI) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Worden Company (Holland,
MI) |
| Appl. No.: | D/284,621 |
| Filed: | September 12, 2007 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29247517 | Jun 23, 2006 | ||||
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/338 |
| Current International Class: | 0601 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/334-338,349,355,363,364,369-370,381,491,500-502,509,511,601 ;297/16.1-16.2,116,135,154,187,158.3,158.4,158.5,184.1,232,244,411.37,440.1,445.1 ;5/12.1,655.3 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 536131 | March 1895 | Coldwell et al. |
| D47792 | September 1915 | Kelsey |
| 1452343 | April 1923 | Jones |
| D78780 | June 1929 | Papa |
| D83452 | February 1931 | Klemm et al. |
| D161772 | January 1951 | Macdonald |
| 2572732 | October 1951 | Keklen et al. |
| D174900 | June 1955 | Flexer et al. |
| 2947348 | August 1960 | Peckham |
| D197652 | March 1964 | Courtwright |
| D200851 | April 1965 | Wise |
| 3353866 | November 1967 | Chapman et al. |
| D219519 | December 1970 | Gianfagna |
| 3632161 | January 1972 | Arfaras et al. |
| D227457 | June 1973 | Skiaroff |
| 3931771 | January 1976 | Kramer |
| D246490 | November 1977 | DuFresne |
| D259282 | May 1981 | Howey et al. |
| D261577 | November 1981 | Heritage |
| D261578 | November 1981 | Heritage |
| 4428616 | January 1984 | Hamilton |
| D296731 | July 1988 | Hollington |
| 4944552 | July 1990 | Harris |
| 5026114 | June 1991 | Miller |
| D331672 | December 1992 | Brodbeck |
| D332189 | January 1993 | Brodbeck |
| D334490 | April 1993 | Johnson |
| D342617 | December 1993 | Louden |
| 5293825 | March 1994 | Cauffiel |
| 5372403 | December 1994 | Puerto |
| D360766 | August 1995 | Sacchi Lodispoto |
| D362348 | September 1995 | Sacchi Lodispoto |
| 5547247 | August 1996 | Dixon |
| 5630642 | May 1997 | Grimmett et al. |
| D396114 | July 1998 | Horton |
| 5799964 | September 1998 | Chao |
| D402476 | December 1998 | Thorp et al. |
| D406903 | March 1999 | Horton |
| D407921 | April 1999 | Horton |
| D421533 | March 2000 | Lininger et al. |
| 6032587 | March 2000 | Salenbauch et al. |
| D427447 | July 2000 | Vu et al. |
| 6142559 | November 2000 | Sorel et al. |
| 6237994 | May 2001 | Bentley et al. |
| D487519 | March 2004 | Staubach et al. |
| 7017988 | March 2006 | Tornero et al. |
| D551878 | October 2007 | Cohen |
| 1 172 252 | Jan 2002 | EP | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McGarry Bair PC
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an embodiment of the ornamental design for modular study furniture according to the invention;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof, and,
FIG. 3 is a top view thereof.
The material in dotted lines forms no part of my design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 