Proctoscope
Tsai March 18, 2
U.S. patent number D564,657 [Application Number D/264,291] was granted by the patent office on 2008-03-18 for proctoscope. Invention is credited to Yih-Chiou Tsai.
| United States Patent | D564,657 |
| Tsai | March 18, 2008 |
Proctoscope
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a proctoscope, as shown.
| Inventors: | Tsai; Yih-Chiou (Taichung Hsien, TW) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/264,291 |
| Filed: | August 8, 2006 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/135; D24/138; D24/141 |
| Current International Class: | 2402 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/138,141,135 ;600/219,220,221,222,225,184 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2469880 | May 1949 | Kowan |
| 3701347 | October 1972 | Belkin |
| 6315713 | November 2001 | Takada |
| D474275 | May 2003 | Tan |
| 6616603 | September 2003 | Fontana |
Assistant Examiner: Lee; Christopher
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bacon & Thomas, PLLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a proctoscope, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right view thereof;
FIG. 6 is top view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 