U.S. patent number D561,544 [Application Number D/268,557] was granted by the patent office on 2008-02-12 for puller jaw. This patent grant is currently assigned to Schley Products, Inc.. Invention is credited to Timothy Hume.
United States Patent | D561,544 |
Hume | February 12, 2008 |
Inventors: | Hume; Timothy (Orange, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Schley Products, Inc. (Anaheim,
CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/268,557 |
Filed: | November 8, 2006 |
Current U.S. Class: | D8/14 |
Current International Class: | 0805 |
Field of Search: | ;D8/51,14,47 ;29/258,259,261 |
1456735 | May 1923 | Hunt |
1631872 | June 1927 | Knight |
2003756 | June 1935 | Nagel |
2109740 | March 1938 | Carlborg |
2136004 | November 1938 | Cornwell |
2296119 | September 1942 | Ringrose |
2303560 | December 1942 | Knight |
2834100 | May 1958 | Harsh |
D296650 | July 1988 | Marx |
4761869 | August 1988 | Barry et al. |
5174005 | December 1992 | Somerville |
D358081 | May 1995 | Tallon |
5557833 | September 1996 | Pool |
D431985 | October 2000 | Chen |
D440132 | April 2001 | Su et al. |
6665918 | December 2003 | Williams |
6895646 | May 2005 | Houg |
7117573 | October 2006 | Hu |
7213317 | May 2007 | Hu |
7216409 | May 2007 | Chiu et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.