Wheel rim
Cheng January 29, 2
U.S. patent number D560,587 [Application Number D/272,620] was granted by the patent office on 2008-01-29 for wheel rim. Invention is credited to Dominic Carson Cheng.
| United States Patent | D560,587 |
| Cheng | January 29, 2008 |
Wheel rim
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a wheel rim, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Cheng; Dominic Carson (South Gate, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/272,620 |
| Filed: | February 13, 2007 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/209 |
| Current International Class: | 1216 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/204-213 ;301/37.101,64.101,65 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D368464 | April 1996 | Morley et al. |
| D438503 | March 2001 | Syring |
| D480036 | September 2003 | Laengerer |
| D497583 | October 2004 | Walbey, Jr. |
| D499061 | November 2004 | Echazabal |
| D527699 | September 2006 | Kiesel |
| D546262 | July 2007 | Arora |
| D547710 | July 2007 | Guevara |
| D548166 | August 2007 | Young |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Chan; Raymond Y. David and Raymond Patent Group
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of wheel rim showing my new design; and,
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 