U.S. patent number D557,684 [Application Number D/245,907] was granted by the patent office on 2007-12-18 for wireless headphone. This patent grant is currently assigned to Wi-Gear Inc.. Invention is credited to Norman Wai Lee, Mark Stephen Pundsack, Douglas Harry Warenback.
United States Patent | D557,684 |
Pundsack , et al. | December 18, 2007 |
Inventors: | Pundsack; Mark Stephen (San Francisco, CA), Lee; Norman Wai (San Francisco, CA), Warenback; Douglas Harry (Novato, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Wi-Gear Inc. (San Francisco,
CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/245,907 |
Filed: | December 30, 2005 |
Current U.S. Class: | D14/205 |
Current International Class: | 1401 |
Field of Search: | ;D14/188,192,205,206,223,156 ;181/129,130 ;381/380,381,374,379 ;379/430,431 ;29/594 |
D287849 | January 1987 | O'Malley et al. |
4689822 | August 1987 | Houng |
D292205 | October 1987 | Kikutani |
D346802 | May 1994 | Sacherman et al. |
5369857 | December 1994 | Sacherman et al. |
D399206 | October 1998 | Yasutomi et al. |
D439574 | March 2001 | Katayama |
D444140 | June 2001 | Ishibashi |
D453015 | January 2002 | Yuyama |
6385325 | May 2002 | Nageno et al. |
D468722 | January 2003 | Schmidt et al. |
D477820 | July 2003 | Suzuki et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.