Stun gun
Rhee October 2, 2
U.S. patent number D552,207 [Application Number D/266,974] was granted by the patent office on 2007-10-02 for stun gun. Invention is credited to Cheol Y. Rhee.
| United States Patent | D552,207 |
| Rhee | October 2, 2007 |
Stun gun
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a stun gun, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Rhee; Cheol Y. (Germantown, MD) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/266,974 |
| Filed: | October 3, 2006 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D22/117 |
| Current International Class: | 2202 |
| Field of Search: | ;D22/117 ;42/1.01,1.08,114,103 ;89/1.11 ;361/232 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D351639 | October 1994 | Su |
| 6256916 | July 2001 | McNulty |
| 6636412 | October 2003 | Smith |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a front, right perspective view of the stun gun showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
The portions in broken lines form no part of the claimed invention.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 