Cut for a diamond
Winkler September 25, 2
U.S. patent number D551,590 [Application Number D/256,392] was granted by the patent office on 2007-09-25 for cut for a diamond. Invention is credited to Zohar Winkler.
| United States Patent | D551,590 |
| Winkler | September 25, 2007 |
Cut for a diamond
Claims
CLAIM I hereby claim the new ornamental design cut for a diamond, as shown.
| Inventors: | Winkler; Zohar (Ramat Gan, IL) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/256,392 |
| Filed: | March 21, 2006 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D11/90 |
| Current International Class: | 1101 |
| Field of Search: | ;D11/1-2,26-29,89-92 ;63/26-28,32 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D480012 | September 2003 | Mehta |
| D506410 | June 2005 | Drezner |
| D514977 | February 2006 | Mehta |
| D524687 | July 2006 | Moller et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Friedman; Mark M.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top view of the ornamental design cut for a diamond;
FIG. 2 is a bottom view of the ornamental design cut for a diamond.
FIG. 3 is a side view of the ornamental design cut for a diamond; and,
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the ornamental design cut for a diamond.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 