U.S. patent number D548,704 [Application Number D/265,343] was granted by the patent office on 2007-08-14 for edge-emitting light-emitting diode. This patent grant is currently assigned to Unity Opto Technology Co., Ltd.. Invention is credited to Ching-Huei Wu, Ming-Shiun Wu.
United States Patent | D548,704 |
Wu , et al. | August 14, 2007 |
Inventors: | Wu; Ching-Huei (San Chung, TW), Wu; Ming-Shiun (San Chung, TW) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Unity Opto Technology Co., Ltd.
(Taipei Hsien, TW) |
Appl. No.: | D/265,343 |
Filed: | August 30, 2006 |
Current U.S. Class: | D13/180 |
Current International Class: | 1303 |
Field of Search: | ;D13/180 ;D26/2 ;257/79,80,81,82,88,89,95,98,99,100,678,680,433,434 ;313/483,498,500 ;361/820 ;362/555,800 |
D476960 | July 2003 | Fukasawa et al. |
D478879 | August 2003 | Imai |
D495668 | September 2004 | Kim et al. |
D504404 | April 2005 | Ishida |
6953952 | October 2005 | Asakawa |
D528999 | September 2006 | Cho et al. |
2002/0149314 | October 2002 | Takahashi et al. |
2003/0136968 | July 2003 | Fjelstad |
2006/0023451 | February 2006 | Han et al. |
2007/0029564 | February 2007 | Han et al. |
2007/0029915 | February 2007 | Kim et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.