Paper product
Vidal , et al. July 10, 2
U.S. patent number D546,068 [Application Number D/262,997] was granted by the patent office on 2007-07-10 for paper product. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Procter & Gamble Company. Invention is credited to Joshua Thomas Fung, Guillermo Matias Vidal.
| United States Patent | D546,068 |
| Vidal , et al. | July 10, 2007 |
Paper product
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a paper product, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Vidal; Guillermo Matias (Cincinnati, OH), Fung; Joshua Thomas (Cincinnati, OH) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Procter & Gamble
Company (Cincinnati, OH) |
| Appl. No.: | D/262,997 |
| Filed: | July 14, 2006 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D5/57; D5/37 |
| Current International Class: | 0506 |
| Field of Search: | ;D5/1-3,5,7-8,11,13-16,19-20,23-28,30,32,35-37,39,43,45,47,49-50,52-66,99 ;D2/749,994 ;D6/582-583,595-596,598,608,603-606,613,616,617,619,622 ;428/17-18,151,154,156,171,187,198,199,540,542.2,542.6,919,904.4 ;D24/124,125,126 ;D25/142,152 ;5/413AM,709 ;162/134,140,109,231 ;156/148,209 ;D7/396.4-5 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D131274 | February 1942 | Fixler |
| D180026 | April 1957 | Kovler |
| D181205 | October 1957 | Kerkovius |
| D255150 | May 1980 | Woon |
| D255151 | May 1980 | Woon |
| 4347092 | August 1982 | Hlaban et al. |
| D352833 | November 1994 | Schulz |
| D354854 | January 1995 | Schulz |
| 5436057 | July 1995 | Schulz |
| D373905 | September 1996 | Schulz |
| 5620776 | April 1997 | Schulz |
| D391400 | March 1998 | Enderby |
| D398780 | September 1998 | Minkin |
| D399062 | October 1998 | Sporing |
| D405269 | February 1999 | Schulz |
| 5874156 | February 1999 | Schulz |
| D408152 | April 1999 | Wilhelm et al. |
| D410337 | June 1999 | Dwiggins et al. |
| D418306 | January 2000 | Burr et al. |
| D422416 | April 2000 | Schulz et al. |
| D437120 | February 2001 | Jahner et al. |
| D449934 | November 2001 | Merkatoris et al. |
| D450933 | November 2001 | Abes |
| 6344111 | February 2002 | Wilhelm |
| 6413614 | July 2002 | Giesler et al. |
| 6423397 | July 2002 | Roussel |
| D465094 | November 2002 | Kuehn et al. |
| 6623837 | September 2003 | Morman et al. |
| D495149 | August 2004 | Ragnarsson et al. |
| 6827819 | December 2004 | Dwiggins et al. |
| 6884492 | April 2005 | Basler et al. |
| D506875 | July 2005 | Del Solar |
| 6916403 | July 2005 | Basler et al. |
| D507888 | August 2005 | Basler et al. |
| D512226 | December 2005 | Simoni et al. |
| D517816 | March 2006 | Dwiggins et al. |
| 2002/0079073 | June 2002 | Wilhelm |
| 2005/0136225 | June 2005 | McKenna et al. |
| 2006/0008621 | January 2006 | Gusky et al. |
| 2084901 | Feb 1999 | GB | |||
| 3001988 | Sep 2001 | GB | |||
| 3001264 | Feb 2002 | GB | |||
| 3003767 | May 2002 | GB | |||
| 3014979 | Oct 2003 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Meyer; Peter D. Zea; Betty J.
Description
The sole FIGURE is a top plan view of a paper product showing our new design.
The broken lines shown along the border of the FIGURE depict the boundaries of one repeat unit of the claimed design and indicate that the design may continue indeterminately in one or more directions. The broken lines form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 