U.S. patent number D544,138 [Application Number D/219,920] was granted by the patent office on 2007-06-05 for light reflector. This patent grant is currently assigned to IP Holdings, LLC. Invention is credited to Craig Hargreaves.
United States Patent | D544,138 |
Hargreaves | June 5, 2007 |
Inventors: | Hargreaves; Craig (Vancouver, WA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | IP Holdings, LLC (Vancouver,
WA) |
Appl. No.: | D/219,920 |
Filed: | December 27, 2004 |
Current U.S. Class: | D26/118 |
Current International Class: | 2699 |
Field of Search: | ;D26/3,24,42,72,75,85,113,118,119,120,128 ;362/219,257,260,294,317,362,368,217 |
D85382 | October 1931 | Guth |
2194841 | March 1940 | Welch |
3025391 | March 1962 | Golko |
D193802 | October 1962 | Thomsen et al. |
3125301 | March 1964 | Stotter |
4669033 | May 1987 | Lee |
4933821 | June 1990 | Anderson |
5192129 | March 1993 | Figueroa |
5570947 | November 1996 | Felland |
D376437 | December 1996 | Karlo et al. |
D399328 | October 1998 | Compton |
D415304 | October 1999 | Brown |
D418626 | January 2000 | Herst et al. |
6053624 | April 2000 | Cronk |
D445943 | July 2001 | Littman |
6257735 | July 2001 | Baar |
D447272 | August 2001 | Smith |
D456938 | May 2002 | Wardenburg |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.