U.S. patent number D542,407 [Application Number D/251,713] was granted by the patent office on 2007-05-08 for vent for respiratory mask. This patent grant is currently assigned to ResMed Limited. Invention is credited to Daniel Robert Judson, Philip Thomas Stallard, Lee James Veliss.
United States Patent | D542,407 |
Stallard , et al. | May 8, 2007 |
Inventors: | Stallard; Philip Thomas (Denistone East, AU), Veliss; Lee James (West Ryde, AU), Judson; Daniel Robert (Lapstone, AU) |
---|---|
Assignee: | ResMed Limited (Bella Vista,
AU) |
Appl. No.: | D/251,713 |
Filed: | January 12, 2006 |
Current U.S. Class: | D24/110.1; D24/110.4; D24/110.5 |
Current International Class: | 2902 |
Field of Search: | ;D24/110.1,110.4-5 ;D25/199 ;D28/260,393 ;128/205.25,206.21,206.26,206.27,207.11,207.13,207.17 |
D469889 | February 2003 | O'Hagin |
6662803 | December 2003 | Gradon et al. |
D486891 | February 2004 | Cronce, Jr. |
6851425 | February 2005 | Jaffre et al. |
D515204 | February 2006 | Guney et al. |
D519206 | April 2006 | Jones et al. |
D519207 | April 2006 | Raje et al. |
D533269 | December 2006 | McAuley et al. |
2005/0199242 | September 2005 | Matula, Jr. et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.