U.S. patent number D537,220 [Application Number D/229,546] was granted by the patent office on 2007-02-20 for suction nozzle. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Hoover Company. Invention is credited to Gilberto Cavada, Jr., Jean Ellen Kiple, Frank Thomas Poggio, John Charles Porter, Kevin Earl Scheifele.
United States Patent | D537,220 |
Porter , et al. | February 20, 2007 |
Inventors: | Porter; John Charles (Alliance, OH), Scheifele; Kevin Earl (Tallmadge, OH), Cavada, Jr.; Gilberto (Melrose Park, IL), Kiple; Jean Ellen (Lake Villa, IL), Poggio; Frank Thomas (Lincolnshire, IL) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Hoover Company (North
Canton, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/229,546 |
Filed: | May 9, 2005 |
Current U.S. Class: | D32/32 |
Current International Class: | 1505 |
Field of Search: | ;D32/17,31-33,38-39 ;15/321-322,324,325,327.5,329,414,415.1,416,418-422,422.1,354,363,366,334,338,41.1 ;362/91 ;43/139 ;134/113 ;D26/29,34-35,51,139 |
D314265 | January 1991 | Hong |
D418267 | December 1999 | Lin |
D440019 | April 2001 | Mehaffey et al. |
D456965 | May 2002 | Paterson et al. |
D495106 | August 2004 | Leyden et al. |
D499850 | December 2004 | Leyden |
D501283 | January 2005 | Carr et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.