Mirror

Hutton December 5, 2

Patent Grant D532980

U.S. patent number D532,980 [Application Number D/239,717] was granted by the patent office on 2006-12-05 for mirror. This patent grant is currently assigned to Donghia, Inc.. Invention is credited to Jennifer Hutton.


United States Patent D532,980
Hutton December 5, 2006

Mirror

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for the mirror, as shown and described.
Inventors: Hutton; Jennifer (New York, NY)
Assignee: Donghia, Inc. (New York, NY)
Appl. No.: D/239,717
Filed: October 3, 2005

Current U.S. Class: D6/300
Current International Class: 0607
Field of Search: ;D6/300-314,444 ;40/700,711,714,716,720,735,745,765,766,780,790,727,757,722-724

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D248711 August 1978 Tougas et al.
D440884 April 2001 Young
D460865 July 2002 Keller
D505553 May 2005 Mohundro

Other References

Pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/225,618, filed Mar. 18, 2005, Hutton. cited by other .
Archive Page of Fondamenta Maini 78, Murano Venice, Italy 30172, Mediterraneo Traditional Venetian Glass Mirror #080SA622. cited by other .
Archive Page of Fondamenta Maini, 78, Murano Venice, Italy 30172, Mediterraneo Contemporary Octagonal Venetian Glass Mirror #FT1030. cited by other .
Web site page, http://www.kohlerinteriors.com/baker, The Thomas Pheasant Collection, Jewel Octagon Mirror No. 7821. cited by other.

Primary Examiner: Seeger; Janice E.
Assistant Examiner: Buffalow; Sydney R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti P.C.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a mirror comprising the new design;

FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof, where the top view is a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof, where the right side view is a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 5 is a front view of an alternative embodiment of said new design, portions of which are cut away to illustrate indeterminate width, which is the sole difference between it and FIGS. 1-4; and,

FIG. 6 is a front view of an alternative embodiment of said new design, portions of which are cut away to illustrate indeterminate height, which is the sole difference between it and FIGS. 1-4.

* * * * *

References


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed