U.S. patent number D530,529 [Application Number D/203,403] was granted by the patent office on 2006-10-24 for right twist stool. This patent grant is currently assigned to Gehry Design, LLC. Invention is credited to Frank O. Gehry.
United States Patent | D530,529 |
Gehry | October 24, 2006 |
Inventors: | Gehry; Frank O. (Los Angeles, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Gehry Design, LLC (Los Angeles,
CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/203,403 |
Filed: | April 13, 2004 |
Current U.S. Class: | D6/349 |
Current International Class: | 0601 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/334-339,349,352,364-366,353,369,370,495,500-502 ;5/12.1 ;297/445.1,232,446.1,447.3,448.1,452.1 |
2805430 | September 1957 | Philbrick |
4185125 | January 1980 | Sakakibara et al. |
4618924 | October 1986 | Hinds |
4666162 | May 1987 | Campbell |
D430412 | September 2000 | Lewis |
D431379 | October 2000 | Lewis |
D439447 | March 2001 | Diekman |
D471888 | March 2003 | Solland |
Modern Plastics Corp. ad, series 200--Radius Cube, 1 pg. cited by examiner . Interior Design Article, Feb. 1989, 1 pg., Ke-zu arm chair with ottomon. cited by examiner . In-Stock monoform cube tables ad, pp. 4 & 5, Intrex Inc. 1983 catalog. cited by examiner. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.