Outsole of a shoe
Holmes October 24, 2
U.S. patent number D530,493 [Application Number D/252,772] was granted by the patent office on 2006-10-24 for outsole of a shoe. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nike, Inc.. Invention is credited to Matthew J. Holmes.
| United States Patent | D530,493 |
| Holmes | October 24, 2006 |
Outsole of a shoe
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an outsole of a shoe, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Holmes; Matthew J. (Portland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Nike, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/252,772 |
| Filed: | January 27, 2006 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/957; D2/960; D2/954; D2/951; D2/949 |
| Current International Class: | 0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/902,947-949,951-957,959-961,964 ;36/3B,22R,24.5,25R,28,32R,34R,67A,59C |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2334719 | November 1943 | Margolin |
| 4378643 | April 1983 | Johnson |
| 4439936 | April 1984 | Clarke et al. |
| D288028 | February 1987 | Chassaing |
| D288621 | March 1987 | Surpuriya et al. |
| D329689 | September 1992 | Hatfield et al. |
| D330800 | November 1992 | Lucas |
| 5231776 | August 1993 | Wagner |
| D348148 | June 1994 | Limauro |
| D377711 | February 1997 | Hawker |
| D380075 | June 1997 | Sell, Jr. et al. |
| D393144 | April 1998 | Ferro |
| D394944 | June 1998 | Doxey |
| D395339 | June 1998 | Gray |
| D395340 | June 1998 | Treser |
| D395740 | July 1998 | Cass |
| D397546 | September 1998 | Merceron |
| D405943 | February 1999 | Merceron |
| D406689 | March 1999 | Murcia |
| D406691 | March 1999 | McDowell |
| D418665 | January 2000 | Hatfield |
| D440748 | April 2001 | Morgan |
| D441947 | May 2001 | Escobar et al. |
| D452061 | December 2001 | Smith |
| 6357145 | March 2002 | James |
| D464476 | October 2002 | Wahoske |
| D467060 | December 2002 | Randesi et al. |
| D470999 | March 2003 | Schroeder et al. |
| D474331 | May 2003 | Dean |
| D474586 | May 2003 | Recchi |
| D476141 | June 2003 | Matis |
| D476142 | June 2003 | Matis |
| D479643 | September 2003 | O'Shea et al. |
| D483554 | December 2003 | Burg et al. |
| 6665958 | December 2003 | Goodwin |
| D487334 | March 2004 | Issler |
| D487955 | April 2004 | Ammon |
| D488916 | April 2004 | McClaskie |
| D495857 | September 2004 | Herbst |
| D497707 | November 2004 | Lee |
| 6820353 | November 2004 | Oman et al. |
| D502308 | March 2005 | Teague |
| D504756 | May 2005 | Adams et al. |
| D508307 | August 2005 | Burg et al. |
| D509950 | September 2005 | Adams et al. |
| D515792 | February 2006 | McClaskie |
| D517786 | March 2006 | Burg |
| 2004/0016146 | January 2004 | Oman et al. |
Other References
|
Nike Footwear Catalog (LS 06), p. 15, published Sep. 2005, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog (LS 05), pp. 60, 116, published Sep. 2004, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog (SP 05), p. 6, published Jun. 2004, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Women's Nike Footwear Catalog (SP 04), p. 9, published Jun. 2003, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Men's Nike Footwear Catalog (SP 04), p. M9, published Jun. 2003, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Men's Nike Footwear Catalog (LS 03), p. 5, published Sep. 2002, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Women's Nike Footwear Catalog (SP 03), p. 14, published Jun. 2002, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Men's Nike Footwear Catalog (SP 03), pp. 34, 35, published Jun. 2002, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Women's Nike Footwear Catalog (HO 01), p. 27, published Feb. 2001, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Women's Nike Footwear Catalog (FA 01), pp. 6, 12, 44, published Nov. 2000, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Men's Nike Footwear Catalog (SP 01), p. 85, published Jun. 2000, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Men's Nike Footwear Catalog (HO 00), pp. 7, 12, published Mar. 2000, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Nike Custom Footwear Catalog (HO 00), p. 3, published Mar. 2000, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Women's Nike Footwear Catalog (SP 99), p. 18, published Nov. 1998, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog (FA 97), pp. M11, M19, published Dec. 1996, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog (SP 89), p. 90, published 1998, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog (1984 Shoe Show), p. 5, published Mar. 2000, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog (Misc.), p. 4, unknown publication date, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog (1973), p. T-F6, unknown publication date, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Murphy; Celia A.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: TraskBritt, P.C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an outsole of a shoe showing my new design; and,
FIG. 2 is a bottom view of an outsole of a shoe shown in FIG. 1.
The uneven broken line immediately adjacent to the shaded area represent the bounds of the claimed design. All other uneven broken lines represent the remaining portion of the shoe. The uneven broken line representations in FIGS. 1-2 are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 