Counting device
Rule October 3, 2
U.S. patent number D529,551 [Application Number D/253,953] was granted by the patent office on 2006-10-03 for counting device. Invention is credited to Scott Rule.
| United States Patent | D529,551 |
| Rule | October 3, 2006 |
Counting device
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a counting device, as shown.
| Inventors: | Rule; Scott (Wheaton, IL) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/253,953 |
| Filed: | February 15, 2006 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D19/62 |
| Current International Class: | 1907 |
| Field of Search: | ;D19/59-64 ;D10/46.1 ;D18/6 ;D21/385 ;116/222-225 ;235/1B,123 ;434/189,203,205 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 447454 | August 1891 | Velasco |
| 1028227 | June 1912 | Bennet |
| 1099009 | June 1914 | Kruger |
| 2655737 | October 1953 | Don Dero |
| D248332 | June 1978 | Bailey et al. |
| 6099377 | August 2000 | Pridemore |
Assistant Examiner: Cavanna; Mark
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Pauley Petersen & Erickson
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a counting device showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a top view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 