U.S. patent number D529,046 [Application Number D/227,656] was granted by the patent office on 2006-09-26 for internal-combustion engine. This patent grant is currently assigned to Honda Motor Co., Ltd.. Invention is credited to Joji Maeda, Masayuki Osumi.
United States Patent | D529,046 |
Maeda , et al. | September 26, 2006 |
Inventors: | Maeda; Joji (Wako, JP), Osumi; Masayuki (Wako, JP) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (Tokyo,
JP) |
Appl. No.: | D/227,656 |
Filed: | April 14, 2005 |
Oct 15, 2004 [JP] | 2004-031405 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D15/1 |
Current International Class: | 1501 |
Field of Search: | ;D15/1-5,14,16-17,149 ;74/606R ;123/41.66,41.67,41.7,50A,50B,50R,51R,51A,195C,198E,306,308,657,667,661 |
D309458 | July 1990 | Johnson et al. |
D331929 | December 1992 | Leaf et al. |
D387357 | December 1997 | Gilmore |
D396476 | July 1998 | Shimizu |
D449051 | October 2001 | Miyashita |
D503723 | April 2005 | Giddens |
632935 Associated Design 7,Design Offical Gazette(s), Issue date: Dec. 18, 1986. cited by other . 632935 Associated Design 10, Design Offical Gazette(s), Issue date: Sep. 9, 1992. cited by other . 1095431, Design Offical Gazette(s), Issue date: Jan. 9, 2001. cited by other. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.