U.S. patent number D527,241 [Application Number D/238,573] was granted by the patent office on 2006-08-29 for utility knife and holster. This patent grant is currently assigned to Dallco Marketing Services, Inc.. Invention is credited to Raymond E. Davis.
United States Patent | D527,241 |
Davis | August 29, 2006 |
Inventors: | Davis; Raymond E. (Heath, TX) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Dallco Marketing Services, Inc.
(Dallas, TX) |
Appl. No.: | D/238,573 |
Filed: | September 16, 2005 |
Current U.S. Class: | D8/99; D3/220 |
Current International Class: | 0803 |
Field of Search: | ;D3/220,228 ;D8/98,99 ;30/151,162,335 ;224/232 |
D401832 | December 1998 | Keklak et al. |
6000590 | December 1999 | Allen |
D420270 | February 2000 | Martone |
6105838 | August 2000 | Hansen |
D435419 | December 2000 | Schmidt |
D439039 | March 2001 | Austin |
D439492 | March 2001 | Martone et al. |
6364182 | April 2002 | Hansen |
6382481 | May 2002 | McIlmoil |
6427374 | August 2002 | Vaiani |
D492179 | June 2004 | Hernandez et al. |
6817499 | November 2004 | Martinez |
6889879 | May 2005 | Rivera et al. |
2003/0042348 | March 2003 | Salentine et al. |
2004/0173650 | September 2004 | Berns |
2005/0072819 | April 2005 | Maldonado et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.