U.S. patent number D526,957 [Application Number D/238,386] was granted by the patent office on 2006-08-22 for mobile device battery. This patent grant is currently assigned to Symbol Technologies, Inc.. Invention is credited to JaeHo Choi, Curt Croley, Carl Thelemann.
United States Patent | D526,957 |
Croley , et al. | August 22, 2006 |
Inventors: | Croley; Curt (Stony Brook, NY), Thelemann; Carl (East Islip, NY), Choi; JaeHo (Whitestone, NY) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Symbol Technologies, Inc.
(Holtsville, NY) |
Appl. No.: | D/238,386 |
Filed: | September 14, 2005 |
Current U.S. Class: | D13/103 |
Current International Class: | 1302 |
Field of Search: | ;D13/102-106,110,118-119,184 ;429/96-100,163,176 |
D303524 | September 1989 | Siegner et al. |
D328733 | August 1992 | Seymour |
D331566 | December 1992 | Seymour |
D400512 | November 1998 | Korhonen |
D402275 | December 1998 | Korhonen |
D406098 | February 1999 | Walter et al. |
D409137 | May 1999 | Sumita et al. |
D423449 | April 2000 | Naskali |
D444448 | July 2001 | Robinson et al. |
D473186 | April 2003 | Grosfeld et al. |
D500746 | January 2005 | Gavel et al. |
D508892 | August 2005 | Schlieffers et al. |
D515026 | February 2006 | Schlieffers et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.