Eyelash curler
Cho February 14, 2
U.S. patent number D515,242 [Application Number D/226,480] was granted by the patent office on 2006-02-14 for eyelash curler. Invention is credited to Yong Hoon Cho.
| United States Patent | D515,242 |
| Cho | February 14, 2006 |
Eyelash curler
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an eyelash curler, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Cho; Yong Hoon (Fullerton, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/226,480 |
| Filed: | March 28, 2005 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D28/36; D28/55 |
| Current International Class: | 2803 |
| Field of Search: | ;D28/36,55 ;132/216,217 ;19/225 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D213239 | January 1969 | Flewwellin |
| 3547135 | December 1970 | Roos |
| D222518 | October 1971 | Brittain |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Maria Erlinda Co Sarno
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the eyelash curler showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is an top view of the eyelash curler thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side view of the eyelash curler thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front end view of the eyelash curler thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear end view of the eyelash curler thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom view of the eyelash curler thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 