U.S. patent number D514,276 [Application Number D/217,278] was granted by the patent office on 2006-02-07 for sliced cylindrical block of food material having two longitudinal cuts. This patent grant is currently assigned to Schreiber Foods, Inc.. Invention is credited to Cole A. Cumpton, Kenny D. Raymond.
United States Patent | D514,276 |
Cumpton , et al. | February 7, 2006 |
Inventors: | Cumpton; Cole A. (Clinton, MO), Raymond; Kenny D. (Lowry City, MO) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Schreiber Foods, Inc. (Green
Bay, WI) |
Appl. No.: | D/217,278 |
Filed: | November 15, 2004 |
Current U.S. Class: | D1/121; D1/130; D1/199 |
Current International Class: | 0101 |
Field of Search: | ;D1/106,121,199,127,129-130 ;D25/113 ;426/130,129,414,121,115,273-274,188,303,518,144 |
D14842 | March 1884 | Griscom, Jr. |
D56913 | January 1921 | Edgerton |
D198741 | July 1964 | Kauffman, Jr. |
3900574 | August 1975 | Warwick |
4046923 | September 1977 | Meng et al. |
4278693 | July 1981 | Dingethal et al. |
5945145 | August 1999 | Narsutis et al. |
6063416 | May 2000 | Teasdale et al. |
6110512 | August 2000 | Teasdale et al. |
D488911 | April 2004 | Childress |
D495463 | September 2004 | Childress |
D497238 | October 2004 | Maniak |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.