U.S. patent number D513,916 [Application Number D/212,118] was granted by the patent office on 2006-01-31 for shaker cup. This patent grant is currently assigned to Namee Manufacturing and Development. Invention is credited to Joe Namee.
United States Patent | D513,916 |
Namee | January 31, 2006 |
Inventors: | Namee; Joe (Round Rock, TX) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Namee Manufacturing and
Development (Cedar Park, TX) |
Appl. No.: | D/212,118 |
Filed: | August 26, 2004 |
Current U.S. Class: | D7/300.1; D7/510 |
Current International Class: | 0701 |
Field of Search: | ;D7/629,300.1,510,511,509,523,321 ;D9/447,446,503,509,515,523,525,445,746 ;366/130 ;222/547,459 ;220/212,739,729,714,254.3,592.16,4.03,568,23.86 ;206/515,520 ;215/12.1,11.1,321 ;99/508 |
302484 | July 1884 | Haslage |
2387151 | October 1945 | Jacobs |
2752971 | July 1956 | Tupper |
2754866 | July 1956 | Coltman |
3341089 | September 1967 | Pearsall |
3820692 | June 1974 | Swett et al. |
D233116 | October 1974 | Swett et al. |
4974741 | December 1990 | Gustafson et al. |
5531353 | July 1996 | Ward et al. |
D421547 | March 2000 | Demers |
6409038 | June 2002 | Karp |
D482936 | December 2003 | Miller et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.