Portion of a shoe upper
Holmes January 31, 2
U.S. patent number D513,851 [Application Number D/216,296] was granted by the patent office on 2006-01-31 for portion of a shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Matthew Jason Holmes.
| United States Patent | D513,851 |
| Holmes | January 31, 2006 |
Portion of a shoe upper
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a portion of a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Holmes; Matthew Jason (Portland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/216,296 |
| Filed: | November 2, 2004 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/902,907,908,943,944,969,972-974 ;36/45,50.1,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-131 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D357794 | May 1995 | Avar et al. |
| D361426 | August 1995 | Baker |
| D373460 | September 1996 | Crowley |
| D391070 | February 1998 | Ford |
| D395349 | June 1998 | Link |
| D398756 | September 1998 | Tong |
| D413719 | September 1999 | Fogg |
| D415882 | November 1999 | McDowell |
| D424798 | May 2000 | McDowell |
| D431714 | October 2000 | Hatfield et al. |
| D433559 | November 2000 | Ruth |
| D449924 | November 2001 | O'Boyle |
| D467722 | December 2002 | Wahoske |
| D475519 | June 2003 | Morris |
| D495864 | September 2004 | Herbst |
| D495866 | September 2004 | Holmes |
| D496152 | September 2004 | Doxey |
| D496153 | September 2004 | Morris |
| D500199 | December 2004 | Clegg |
Other References
|
Nike Footwear Catalog Holiday 2004, Published Mar. 2004, pp. M18, W37. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Late Spring 2004, Published Sep. 2003, p. M59. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Jordan Late Spring 2003, Published Sep. 2002, p. 7. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Late Spring 2002, Published Sep. 2001, p. W26. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Late Spring 2001, Published Sep. 2000, p. M12. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Spring 2001, Published Jun. 2000, pp. M8, M38. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Holiday 2000, Published Mar. 2000, p. M41. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Late Spring 1999, Published Sep. 1998, p. M44. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Fall 1996, Published Dec. 1995, p. 6. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Fall 1994, Published Nov. 1993, p. 1. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Holiday 1993, Published Mar. 1993, p. 14. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Fall 1993, Published Dec. 1992, pp. 126, 128. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Fall 1991, Published Dec. 1990, p. 46. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a portion of a shoe upper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a rear perspective view thereof.
The broken lines immediately adjacent to the shaded areas represent an unclaimed boundary of the design. The broken line showing of the remainder of the shoe is for illustrative purposes only and forms no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 