Juicer
Hsu December 20, 2
U.S. patent number D512,882 [Application Number D/212,229] was granted by the patent office on 2005-12-20 for juicer. This patent grant is currently assigned to Biotek Technology Corp.. Invention is credited to Maxwell Hsu.
| United States Patent | D512,882 |
| Hsu | December 20, 2005 |
Juicer
Claims
The ornamental design for a juicer, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Hsu; Maxwell (Tao-Yuan, TW) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Biotek Technology Corp.
(Chung-Li, TW) |
| Appl. No.: | D/212,229 |
| Filed: | August 30, 2004 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/665 |
| Current International Class: | 3100 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/665,666,372-374 ;99/495,501-513,348,357,492,497,499 ;241/33,36,37,100,282.2 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D333947 | March 1993 | Markee et al. |
| 6058833 | May 2000 | Ling et al. |
| D439808 | April 2001 | McClean et al. |
| 6412404 | July 2002 | Hsu |
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a juicer showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 