Exerciser
Summers November 29, 2
U.S. patent number D512,111 [Application Number D/190,429] was granted by the patent office on 2005-11-29 for exerciser. Invention is credited to Neil Summers.
| United States Patent | D512,111 |
| Summers | November 29, 2005 |
Exerciser
Claims
The ornamental design for an exerciser, as shown.
| Inventors: | Summers; Neil (Abinger Bottom, Docking, Surrey, GB) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/190,429 |
| Filed: | September 18, 2003 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Mar 19, 2003 [GB] | 3011754 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/668 |
| Current International Class: | 2102 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/663,668,669,670 ;482/51,52,71,63 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 5020793 | June 1991 | Loane |
| 5279532 | January 1994 | Chen |
| 5328427 | July 1994 | Sleamaker |
| 5582567 | December 1996 | Chang |
| 6280366 | August 2001 | Hsieh |
| 6368254 | April 2002 | Wall |
| 6514180 | February 2003 | Rawls |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Baker & Daniels
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view from above and one side of the execiser showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a front perspective view from below.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 