U.S. patent number D506,257 [Application Number D/193,118] was granted by the patent office on 2005-06-14 for ophthalmological instrument arm. This patent grant is currently assigned to Reliance Medical Products, Inc.. Invention is credited to Neil Smith.
United States Patent | D506,257 |
Smith | June 14, 2005 |
Inventors: | Smith; Neil (Hanover, PA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Reliance Medical Products, Inc.
(Mason, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/193,118 |
Filed: | October 31, 2003 |
Current U.S. Class: | D24/172 |
Current International Class: | 2401 |
Field of Search: | ;D24/172 ;351/200,236,245 ;312/209,276 ;606/4,10,19 |
D198232 | May 1964 | Maier |
3572913 | March 1971 | Korb et al. |
D235274 | June 1975 | Armbruster |
3913582 | October 1975 | Sharon |
4270845 | June 1981 | Takizawa et al. |
4643547 | February 1987 | Collins et al. |
D292526 | October 1987 | Nakayama |
5480212 | January 1996 | Marconet |
D378315 | March 1997 | Schwaegerle et al. |
5717480 | February 1998 | Brooks et al. |
5907387 | May 1999 | Schwaegerle |
D424200 | May 2000 | Smith |
D425991 | May 2000 | Smith et al. |
6095649 | August 2000 | Brooks et al. |
2003/0028181 | February 2003 | Enomoto |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.