Gaff hook
Amburgey May 10, 2
U.S. patent number D504,934 [Application Number D/207,430] was granted by the patent office on 2005-05-10 for gaff hook. Invention is credited to James D. Amburgey.
| United States Patent | D504,934 |
| Amburgey | May 10, 2005 |
Gaff hook
Claims
The ornamental design for a gaff hook, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Amburgey; James D. (Pinckney, MI) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/207,430 |
| Filed: | June 14, 2004 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D22/149 |
| Current International Class: | 2205 |
| Field of Search: | ;D22/149,134,199 ;43/53.5,17.2,4-5 ;294/14,26 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4206561 | June 1980 | Wong et al. |
| 4955647 | September 1990 | Alfredson |
| D362898 | October 1995 | Krupp |
| D456484 | April 2002 | D'Antico |
| 6694664 | February 2004 | Knight |
| 2002/0121041 | September 2002 | Haggerty |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Deimen; James M.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of the gaff hook showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a back elevational view;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view;
FIG. 5 is a right elevational view; and,
FIG. 6 is a left elevational view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 