Welder
Crisler, III , et al. May 10, 2
U.S. patent number D504,903 [Application Number D/195,593] was granted by the patent office on 2005-05-10 for welder. This patent grant is currently assigned to Campbell Hausfeld/Scott Fetzer Company. Invention is credited to Howard E. Crisler, III, Roger L. DeYoung, Brian L. Frost, David J. Moore.
| United States Patent | D504,903 |
| Crisler, III , et al. | May 10, 2005 |
Welder
Claims
The ornamental design for a welder, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Crisler, III; Howard E. (Antioch, TN), DeYoung; Roger L. (Franklin, TN), Moore; David J. (Mt. Juliet, TN), Frost; Brian L. (Mt. Juliet, TN) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Campbell Hausfeld/Scott Fetzer
Company (Harrison, OH) |
| Appl. No.: | D/195,593 |
| Filed: | December 15, 2003 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D15/144 |
| Current International Class: | 1509 |
| Field of Search: | ;D15/144-144.2 ;222/146.5,152,156,397,189.06 ;219/424 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D357263 | April 1995 | Soderholm |
| D357927 | May 1995 | Soderholm |
| D416030 | November 1999 | Weller et al. |
| D454578 | March 2002 | Armbruster et al. |
| D467257 | December 2002 | Andersson et al. |
| D489741 | May 2004 | Calco et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Jones Day
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a welder embodying the ornamental design of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a side view of the welder, the opposite side view being a mirror image;
FIG. 3 is front view of the welder;
FIG. 4 is a top view of the welder; and,
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of another welder embodying the ornamental design of the present invention, in which dashed broken lines define unclaimed features, and dot-dash broken lines define boundaries of the claimed design.
The broken lines in FIGS. 1-5 are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design. More specifically, dashed broken lines define unclaimed features. Dot-dash broken lines, drawn with heavier weight than the dashed broken lines, define boundaries of the claimed design.
As shown in FIGS. 1-2, the claimed design includes a rectangular array of holes at both sides of the welder. Each array has a length extending parallel with an inclined top edge of the welder. The size of the holes in the array and the number of rows and columns in the array are not limited to the size of the holes and the number of rows and columns shown in FIGS. 1-2. This fact is illustrated by the welder of FIG. 5 having an array with larger holes, fewer rows and fewer columns than in FIG. 1, without departing from the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 